Hey Gautham B A,

I am currently experiencing a similar issue.  I have found that using 
NewInstance() causes a slow memory growth/leak in our application.  We 
aggressively call LowMemoryNotification() 
on our scripts, as they are meant to run for a very long time and accept 
the performance tradeoff.  This should theoretically clean up stray 
objects, but it seems that objects created via
NewInstance() are never properly marked for GC (maybe, I don't really know 
what's being held).  What's odd is that I can create a weak persistent 
beneath one of these objects, and they
get cleaned up regularly in the memory notification calls.

Are you still having issues?  I might make a test program and throw it on a 
gist and report back here.  I'd be curious as this doesn't seem like 
acceptable behavior for the engine.

I don't see an actual memory leak in the code you posted but creating 
> a new ObjectTemplate for every query isn't very efficient. 
>

Just wanted to reply to this to say, that is an irrelevant point to this 
discussion.  Even if you are using it sparingly, if you have a long-running 
script that calls NewInstance(), then
this would be a problem.

On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 5:27:59 AM UTC-4, Gautham B A wrote:
>
> Yes, the memory leak in this code isn't visible as it appears. 
> I observed the memory leak when I ran the "top" command. But when I 
> commented out the call to "NewInstance()", there wasn't any growth in 
> memory (which is obvious because there's nothing being created and passed 
> onto the JS world).
>
> On Tuesday, 18 April 2017 14:49:11 UTC+5:30, Ben Noordhuis wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Gautham B A 
>> <gautham....@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> > Thank you Ben. 
>> > Yes, there's a try_catch.HasCaught() before running the script in order 
>> to 
>> > prevent the process from exiting. 
>> > Here's the code that will cause the script to run - 
>> > int SendUpdate(std::string value, std::string meta, 
>> >                          std::string doc_type) { 
>> >   v8::Locker locker(GetIsolate()); 
>> >   v8::Isolate::Scope isolate_scope(GetIsolate()); 
>> >   v8::HandleScope handle_scope(GetIsolate()); 
>> > 
>> >   v8::Local<v8::Context> context = 
>> >       v8::Local<v8::Context>::New(GetIsolate(), context_); 
>> >   v8::Context::Scope context_scope(context); 
>> > 
>> >   v8::TryCatch try_catch(GetIsolate()); 
>> > 
>> >   v8::Handle<v8::Value> args[2]; 
>> >   if (doc_type.compare("json") == 0) { 
>> >     args[0] = 
>> >         v8::JSON::Parse(v8::String::NewFromUtf8(GetIsolate(), 
>> > value.c_str())); 
>> >   } else { 
>> >     args[0] = v8::String::NewFromUtf8(GetIsolate(), value.c_str()); 
>> >   } 
>> > 
>> >   args[1] = 
>> >       v8::JSON::Parse(v8::String::NewFromUtf8(GetIsolate(), 
>> meta.c_str())); 
>> > 
>> >   if (try_catch.HasCaught()) { 
>> >     last_exception = ExceptionString(GetIsolate(), &try_catch); 
>> >     LOG(logError) << "Last exception: " << last_exception << '\n'; 
>> >   } 
>> > 
>> >   v8::Local<v8::Function> on_doc_update = 
>> >       v8::Local<v8::Function>::New(GetIsolate(), on_update_); 
>> >   on_doc_update->Call(context->Global(), 2, args); 
>> > 
>> >   if (try_catch.HasCaught()) { 
>> >     LOG(logDebug) << "Exception message: " 
>> >                   << ExceptionString(GetIsolate(), &try_catch) << '\n'; 
>> > 
>> >     return ON_UPDATE_CALL_FAIL; 
>> >   } 
>> > 
>> >   return SUCCESS; 
>> > } 
>> > 
>> > Is it possible to reclaim the memory without shutting the VM down? 
>>
>> Depends on what you mean by 'reclaim' and 'memory leak' - memory isn't 
>> reclaimed until the garbage collector deems it necessary.  People 
>> often mistake that for a memory leak when it is in fact the garbage 
>> collector doing its work (or rather, doing as little work as it can 
>> get away with.) 
>>
>> I don't see an actual memory leak in the code you posted but creating 
>> a new ObjectTemplate for every query isn't very efficient.  If you 
>> don't use ObjectTemplate features, replace it with Object::New(). 
>>
>

-- 
-- 
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"v8-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to