LGTM

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 8:23 AM Adam Klein <ad...@chromium.org> wrote:

> This LGTM, based on the stage at TC39.
>
> It'd be nice if we knew more about other browser plans, given the history
> here. Do you know if Firefox has plans to try again with this name anytime
> soon?
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 1:24 AM 'Mathias Bynens' via v8-users <
> v8-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> Contact emails
>>
>> math...@chromium.org
>>
>> Spec
>>
>> https://tc39.github.io/proposal-global/
>>
>> Summary
>>
>> A Stage 3 proposal introduces globalThis, enabling a universal mechanism
>> to access the global object even in strict functions or modules, regardless
>> of the platform.
>>
>> Motivation
>>
>> It is difficult to write portable ECMAScript code which accesses the
>> global object. On the web, it is accessible as window or self or this or
>> frames; on Node.js, it is global or this; among those, only this is
>> available in a shell like V8's d8. In a standalone function call in
>> sloppy mode, this works too, but it's undefined in modules or in strict
>> mode within a function. In such contexts, the global object can still be
>> accessed using Function('return this')(), but that form is incompatible
>> with some CSP settings, such as within Chrome Apps.
>>
>> Interoperability and compatibility risk
>>
>> An earlier version of this proposal had a different name: global. Sadly,
>> this name was found to be not Web-compatible when Firefox shipped it
>> <https://github.com/tc39/proposal-global/issues/20>. After collaborating
>> with other browsers vendors and looking at data on real-world use of
>> JavaScript identifiers on the web, we believe the new name to be
>> Web-compatible.
>>
>> Is this feature fully tested?
>>
>> Yes. In addition to V8's own tests (v8/test/mjsunit/harmony/global*.js),
>> Test262 includes tests for this feature
>> <https://github.com/tc39/test262/search?q=%22features%3A+%5BglobalThis%5D%22>
>> .
>>
>> Tracking bug
>>
>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=5537
>>
>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status dashboard
>>
>> https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6571514765770752
>>
>> Requesting approval to ship?
>>
>> Yes. Note that since this is a V8/JS feature, this post is just an FYI to
>> blink-dev — no signoff from Blink API owners is required.
>>
>> --
>> --
>> v8-users mailing list
>> v8-users@googlegroups.com
>> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "v8-users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> --
> v8-users mailing list
> v8-users@googlegroups.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "v8-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"v8-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to