When you say "local to the evaluation context", what do you mean? Modules
can't have side-effects on the lexical top-level scope of the importing
module; they can only affect the broader "realm" (in ECMAScript spec
terms), the v8::Context (in V8 API terms) or the mutable global state (in
more common terms). The current API is designed to allow one evaluation per
v8::Context, since part of Instantiation
<https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/v8/include/v8.h?rcl=ab5fb228bcaf387cc72dfd93cdc62c1db4867ebf&l=1302>
is tying a v8::Module to a v8::Context. So if you instantatiate a module in
multiple context, multiple evaluations should still work.

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 7:12 AM ClearScript Developers <
clearscript...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry to revive this thread, but we're encountering the same issue.
>
> v8::Script is not a replacement for v8::Module; for one thing, scripts
> can't import modules :)
>
> In any case, V8's API seems deficient here. Modules can be imported
> specifically for their side effects. There's even unique syntax for that
> (see
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/import#Import_a_module_for_its_side_effects_only).
> And since side effects can be local to the evaluation context, it should be
> possible to evaluate a module in multiple contexts.
>
> Opinions?
>
> On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 2:54:26 PM UTC-5, Adam Klein wrote:
>>
>> Modules are designed (in the JavaScript spec) to only have their
>> top-level code run once. To  "re-use" a cached module, the expectation is
>> that other modules would use imports to access the exports of that module.
>> In particular, in your code snippet, you'd return the already-evaluated
>> module from the ResolveCallback passed to the module that wishes to import
>> from it.
>>
>> If what you want to do is compile some code and run it multiple times, a
>> v8::Script is probably want you want instead.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:11 PM Jane Chen <jxch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Embedding v8 6.7.
>>>
>>> I found the following test in test-modules.cc:
>>>
>>>     CHECK(module->Evaluate(env.local())
>>>               .ToLocalChecked()
>>>               ->StrictEquals(v8_str("gaga")));
>>>     CHECK_EQ(Module::kEvaluated, module->GetStatus());
>>>     CHECK(module->Evaluate(env.local()).ToLocalChecked()->IsUndefined());
>>>
>>> and it is consistent with what I'm seeing.  Basically, evaluating an
>>> evaluated module returns undefined.  I don't get the rational for this
>>> behavior.  Once a module is evaluated, it is no good for evaluation?  Then
>>> how am I supposed to re-use a cached module?  Re-instantiating it doesn't
>>> seem to help.
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> v8-users mailing list
>>> v8-u...@googlegroups.com
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "v8-users" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to v8-u...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
> --
> v8-users mailing list
> v8-users@googlegroups.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "v8-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/v8-users/a7260cfa-cc60-4870-b11d-b2d00c79eb01%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/v8-users/a7260cfa-cc60-4870-b11d-b2d00c79eb01%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"v8-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/v8-users/CAEvLGcKF03fPBMkN1RmUA8fFXTMgz53WN2Qcyqz3Kaq88Pd-yQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to