On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Luca Bruno <lethalma...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Andrea Del Signore <seje...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> can you elaborate a little why the transform branch should be merged >> before? >> What's its purpose? >> >> Anyway we are talking about experimental stuff and we shouldn't be >> worried about compatibility and such, so why not include a simple >> patch like mine and after go for the full solution? > > > I don't think you're able to resurrect posix and dova with only that patch > plus a plugin, am I wrong?
On a second look you are clearly right, the remove of the posix or dova profile touched more files than just the codegen ones. I'll write more on this in another mail. Ciao, Andrea _______________________________________________ vala-devel-list mailing list vala-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-devel-list
