On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 12:09 +0200, Frederik wrote: > I think in the GIO vapi bindings there are more parameters that should > be marked as nullable. For example: "etag" as in File.replace() or > "progress_callback" as in File.move().
Yes, we certainly still miss a lot of nullable annotations. > btw, is it an inconsistency that File objects get constructed by > > File.new_for_commandline_arg() > File.new_for_path() > File.new_for_uri() > > instead of > > new File.for_commandline_arg() > new File.for_path() > new File.for_uri() No, that's intentional. GLib.File is an interface, not a class, and interfaces never have creation methods. GLib.File.new_for_path() is a static factory method, that uses the default Vfs to create an instance of a class that implements GLib.File. Jürg _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list Vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
