On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Jürg Billeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 22:42 -0700, Michael Lawrence wrote: > > When overriding a property, I found that I needed to declare it > > 'public' before it was actually accessible (i.e. the internal getter > > function was defined but the override was not registered in > > class_init). Is this by design? It's certainly strange to privately > > override something. > > The convention in Vala and C# are that the accessibility of the > overriding method must be the same as the accessibility of the > overridden method. We might want to consider to allow more flexibility > at some point, however, at the moment you should follow the convention. > This makes sense, but why is it possible to omit the "public" keyword when overriding a method, but not for a property? > > Juerg > >
_______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list Vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
