On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 05:09 -0400, Yu Feng wrote: > On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 10:44 +0200, Jürg Billeter wrote: > > Maybe I'm just missing an interesting use case, however, I currently > > fail to see where the snippet approach makes it more comfortable to > > write or use bindings. Can you provide examples where you think that it > > makes more sense to handle it in a snippet instead of the compiler code? > > I'm not convinced by the g_strv_length example as this would clutter the > > bindings too much, in my opinion. > > Again it is for rare cases. I am thinking hard to make the snipples > working well, and I'll collect more cases later. I don't expect there to > be much though. Should it be much fewer than [NoArrayLength] stuff.
Ok, as you agree that the null-terminated arrays should be handled, your g_strv_length example is not a real use case for the snippet support. Can you provide a concrete example where you think it makes more sense to use a CCode snippet than anything else? > BTW: I found a way to kill the vast number static wrappers in DBus > dynamic methods. File a new bug? Sure. Cheers, Jürg _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list Vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
