On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 05:24 -0400, Yu Feng wrote: > On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 11:04 +0200, Jürg Billeter wrote: > > > Another direction of this patch is to allow small wrapping code in > > > the .vapi declarations (which might ease the vapi authors's life) > > > > This is the only place where I might consider it useful. However, so far > > I'm not convinced that it really helps, see my other response. > > > intended for binding (again, using some asm wrap a call to int13) and I > began with .vala files because I thought they were easier to do > experiment with. > > Perhaps the binding authors can find more examples? in Samba and GST > bindings? If we put it to upstream people will eventually find use > cases. It should be rare. > > To pull the vala GList wrappers out I need to patch the <generic> > (valagenis?) to allow overriding with respect of generic. The patch is > already large and it is not wise to make it larger before positive > responses. > > How much can this vapi-only patch hurt vala in a long run?
The patch is already getting quite big, and it seems that you've added a partial C parser in there. Before I'm considering maintaining this, I'd need a strong use case, so far I haven't seen one that would justify it. Jürg _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list Vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
