On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 02:19 +0100, Hans Vercammen wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 12:10 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote: > > > > * `(owned)' cast replaces `#' reference transfer expression > > > > Even less used, equally unintuitive. Example of new syntax: > > > > string foo = (owned) bar; > > I don't have a strong opinion on this since I don't really need it, but > using a cast expression feels a bit wrong. Not sure if we want to keep > the option open of having operator overloading, but what about something > like: > > string foo <= bar; > or > string foo << bar;
<= and << are already operators in use and would be confusing but i do agree the use of cast syntax here is odd I would suggest something thats not a cast but still clear: string foo owns bar; or string foo = owned bar; jamie _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list Vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
