Am Thursday 05 February 2009 16:04:04 schrieb Ed Schouten: > * Jürg Billeter <j...@bitron.ch> wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 02:07 +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > > > Please add to posix.vapi: > > > > Thanks, committed. > > Wouldn't it have been better to make this type safe? We could have used > enumerations for this. Signal.INT or something.
Personally, I think that's overkill for the posix binding, but it's Jürgs call of course. > I also don't really > agree there are definitions for non-standard signals there. What is a > SIGCLD? It's a synonym for SIGCHLD used in lots of older code. When I submitted my contribution I though I might as well strive for completeness. Feel free to submit a patch that removes it, if it bothers you too much. -- :M: _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list Vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
