On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:25:37PM -0400, tecywiz121 wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> This is the second snippet I was curious about.
>
> Basically, valac should not allow the following code to compile since
> IMHO, its completely wrong.
>
> Just checking whether I should file a bug report or not.
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> public class TestClass
> {
> public abstract bool test_prop { get; set; }
> }
>
> public static int main(string[] args)
> {
> TestClass tc = new TestClass();
>
> bool test = tc.test_prop;
>
> stdout.printf("%s\n", test ? "TRUE" : "FALSE");
> return 0;
> }
> Given class TestSubclass : TestClass overriding test_prop: TestClass tc = new TestSubclass(); bool test = tc.test_prop; It's completely right. You might want to make TestClass an abstract class to not instantiate it, but problems come on runtime and it's not a compiler failure if you don't override the property. -- http://www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
