On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 12:35:26 +0100, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote: > Il giorno ven, 03/12/2010 alle 17.18 +0100, Abderrahim Kitouni ha > scritto: > > > session_proxy.name_acquired.connect (this.name_acquired); > > What I would have done is: > > > > session_proxy.name_acquired.connect ((name) => > > this.name_acquired.begin(name)); > > Ok, cool this works thanks. However in this case the lambda should be > (p, name) => this.nameacquired.begin(p, name); ;-) > > However I guess that this is just a workaround, the related bug should > be fixed!
It's not a bug. The 'async' is part of the function signature, so the function signatures don't match and it can't be converted. It might be a missing feature, but I think it's preferable to explicitly require the .begin. > > You can also try to pass the begin method directly (but I'm not sure it > > works). > > No, I tried that, but it didn't work, I got an error since the begin > return value was considered just like a void. Hm, the begin function returns a void, but that's what the signal expects anyway, so it seems like that one should work. That would be a bug than. -- Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <b...@ucw.cz> _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list