Thanks, it's at least less clumsy.
2011/12/25 Luca Bruno <lethalma...@gmail.com>: > On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Artem Tarasov <lomerei...@googlemail.com> > wrote: >> >> Is there a better solution? Maybe another CCode option should be >> added, like "generate_typedef" or something, which value of false >> would mean to expand the type everywhere (into "return-type >> (*variable-name) (param-types)")? > > > No better solution at the moment, just create a custom .h with the relevant > define and add that to the cheader_filename of the struct, very simple. > > -- > www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
