Il 18/04/2013 23:38, Alexander Krivács Schrøder ha scritto:
Hi.When you have an auto-property like public int64 minutes { get; private set; } in your class, the generated public .vapi file gets the exact same signature, i.e. public int64 minutes { get; private set; } Wouldn't it make more sense to just leave out the "private set" part from the .vapi, i.e. have it just be public int64 minutes { get; } Is there any good reason to include the "private set"? It's not like a consumer of your library can do anything useful with that information anyway, right? Internal classes, for instance, are left out of the .vapi file...
Right, there shouldn't be any need of private set in a vapi. _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list vala-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
