Author: sewardj
Date: 2007-10-29 20:48:01 +0000 (Mon, 29 Oct 2007)
New Revision: 7051
Log:
Hmm, I thought this had been committed in r6933. Strange.
Added:
branches/THRCHECK/thrcheck/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp
Added: branches/THRCHECK/thrcheck/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp
===================================================================
--- branches/THRCHECK/thrcheck/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp
(rev 0)
+++ branches/THRCHECK/thrcheck/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp
2007-10-29 20:48:01 UTC (rev 7051)
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+
+Thread #6 was created
+ at 0x........: clone (in /...libc...)
+ by 0x........: ...
+ by 0x........: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (in /lib/libpthread...)
+ by 0x........: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tc_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:34)
+
+Thread #6: lock order "0x........ before 0x........" violated
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (tc_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: dine (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:19)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (tc_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: ...
+ by 0x........: ...
+
+ERROR SUMMARY: 1000 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Valgrind-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
