In December, I was seeing this assertion failure, but the
stack traceback was poor (probably because I had a patched valgrind); see
http://www.kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs-2007-12-14/vg-winmm_wave-diff.txt
With today's Valgrind from svn, unpatched, the assertion still's
happening, but the stack traceback is much better. Here's the text:
Memcheck: mc_leakcheck.c:698 (vgMemCheck_do_detect_memory_leaks):
Assertion 'lc_shadows[i]->data + lc_shadows[i]->szB <=
lc_shadows[i+1]->data' failed.
at report_and_quit (m_libcassert.c:140)
by vgPlain_assert_fail (m_libcassert.c:200)
by vgMemCheck_do_detect_memory_leaks (mc_leakcheck.c:697)
by mc_detect_memory_leaks (mc_main.c:4214)
by mc_fini (mc_main.c:4904)
by shutdown_actions_NORETURN (m_main.c:2025)
by run_a_thread_NORETURN (syswrap-linux.c:144)
sched status:
running_tid=1
This is on Ubuntu Feisty, running the wine conformance test suite.
Worth filing a bug for?
- Dan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Valgrind-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
