John Reiser <jreiser <at> bitwagon.com> writes:
> What is surprising about it? Namely, what did you expect, and what > is the difference with what you actually get? > To me the output looks like a sane 64-bit environment, > also with support for 32-bit executables. > I was surprised to see amd as the primary when I have an Intel chip. Someone explained it refers to the arch, not the chip, and thats probably your point too, so no worry. > > Those error messages (quoted above) look like the output > which "gcc -m32" would give, namely compiling for 32-bit i686 > despite all the flags for 64-bit (namely "-DVGA_amd64=1" etc.) And thats why Im an idiot and youre a genius. I changed my compiler and it worked!!!! Thank you so much. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
