On Mon, 18 May 2026 13:48:38 GMT, Roland Westrelin <[email protected]> wrote:

>>> Do we need both C2_CONTROL_DEPENDENT_LOAD and `C2_UNKNOWN_CONTROL_LOAD here?
>> 
>> I took this from `ArrayCopyNode::load` where we have both as well (I think 
>> you did that with JDK-8323274 :slightly_smiling_face: ). We also have both 
>> in a few other places, for example in the `needs_range_check` branch in 
>> `Parse::array_load` (added with JDK-8333889).
>> 
>>> Also, if the value is known null free and non atomic at compile time (the 
>>> runtime checks control fold and the loads are control dependent on the 
>>> range check), wouldn't we want to not pin the load?
>> 
>> You mean if the array layout is known at compile time and the load is 
>> directly below the the range check? Yes, I think in that case we would want 
>> to not pin the load. Seems a bit risky / non-trivial though. Are you fine 
>> with deferring to a follow-up enhancement?
>
>> > Do we need both C2_CONTROL_DEPENDENT_LOAD and `C2_UNKNOWN_CONTROL_LOAD 
>> > here?
>> 
>> I took this from `ArrayCopyNode::load` where we have both as well (I think 
>> you did that with JDK-8323274 🙂 ). We also have both in a few other places, 
>> for example in the `needs_range_check` branch in `Parse::array_load` (added 
>> with JDK-8333889).
> 
> Right. We need both because the first one causes the control to be set and 
> the second to set the dependency type.
> 
>> > Also, if the value is known null free and non atomic at compile time (the 
>> > runtime checks control fold and the loads are control dependent on the 
>> > range check), wouldn't we want to not pin the load?
>> 
>> You mean if the array layout is known at compile time and the load is 
>> directly below the the range check? Yes, I think in that case we would want 
>> to not pin the load. Seems a bit risky / non-trivial though. Are you fine 
>> with deferring to a follow-up enhancement?
> 
> Sure.

Thanks Roland, I filed 
[JDK-8384865](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8384865) for this.

-------------

PR Review Comment: 
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2445#discussion_r3259441024

Reply via email to