----- Mail original ----- > De: "John Rose" <john.r.r...@oracle.com> > À: "Brian Goetz" <brian.go...@oracle.com> > Cc: "valhalla-spec-experts" <valhalla-spec-experts@openjdk.java.net> > Envoyé: Mercredi 27 Février 2019 22:01:07 > Objet: Re: lazy statics design notes
> On Feb 27, 2019, at 12:58 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.go...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >> I think the answer to all the objections is "then just use <clinit>". > > That's fair. Maybe I was overthinking that part. yes :) > >> Programmers are lazy; we can use this to our advantage. If the users get the >> benefit of lazy initialization with one new keyword (lazy-final), they will >> likely use it because programmers love to prematurely optimize and sprinkling >> "lazy" is easy. The result will be, most <clinits> will empty out, except >> for >> the ones doing weird stuff. > > Bravo, yes. yes, for this specific case, premature optimization goes in the direction we want. Rémi > >> (This strategy is analogous to: to lose weight, you need not control what you >> eat, you just need to control what food is in your house. And you don't even >> have to do anything here other than "don't buy more unhealthy food"; our >> natural snacking tendencies will empty out the pantry fast enough, and then >> all >> that's left will be kale soon enough.) > > You can *DO* that??
