I wish I hadn't missed this meeting, but I was still paying the consequences for a bad decision to take an "overnight layover" coming home Monday night/Tuesday morning.
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 7:31 AM Dan Smith <daniel.sm...@oracle.com> wrote: > > - "We need help to migrate from bucket 1 to 2; and, the == problem": Kevin > asked about JEP 390 applying to non-JDK classes, and about whether javac > should discourage use of '==' > I will try to pitch this `obj==` problem more comprehensively soon. > - "Foo / Foo.ref is a backward default": Kevin and Brian argued that we > should prefer treating B3 classes as reference-default, with something like > '.val' to opt in to a primitive value type > I will say that I have not personally found the opposition to this change to be nearly as strong as the principal arguments in favor. It creates a very valuable uniformity in how things work. I hope it goes this way. -- Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kev...@google.com
