And `var` ?
(but I agree this feels a niche)
Maurizio
On 03/06/2022 18:59, Brian Goetz wrote:
On 6/3/2022 1:39 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Brian Goetz" <brian.go...@oracle.com>
*To: *"daniel smith" <daniel.sm...@oracle.com>,
"valhalla-spec-experts" <valhalla-spec-experts@openjdk.java.net>
*Sent: *Friday, June 3, 2022 6:21:26 PM
*Subject: *Re: Anonymous value classes
There is no chance to get any calling-convention optimization
here, since the concrete class name will not show up in any
method descriptor (or preload attribute). There is no chance to
get any heap flattening here, since the concrete class name will
not show up in any field descriptor or `newarray` operand.
Nope, anonymous classes are anonymous only for Java not in the
bytecode, by example
OK, correction: such a vanishingly microscopic chance as to be
completely ignorable :)
