hi there sorry to cut into ur interesting cricket discussion, but don't u guys think its time to change the subject line from "reunion in boston.......addition to family" to something more appropriate? :-)
cheers! indu On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:08 AM, Nayan Mapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmmmm, > > Good ones from Disha and you both! > > Arre, boss changing the composition of the team is not advisable especially > since you have won the last test match and were looking down the barrel in > the previous one since our batters got out cheaply in the first one! Every > bowler can bat but that doesnt mean that you can count Harbhajan/Zaheer or > Kumble for their batting in place of a proven track record of Laxman. I dont > think we are going to need 5 bowlers in the Delhi match. 5 bowlers are > needed on a ground where wickets are hard to come by, Delhi is a more bowler > friendly wicket as has been seen in the previous matches played on this > ground. There is a theory in cricket, when you are sure about the result you > never go overboard, i mean you never play an additional bowler at the cost > of a batsmen! For me, the ideal situation would be not to change the > composition of the team since Kumble's current form is pretty ordinary but > in case he has to play then obviously either Amit Mishra or Bhajji will have > to sit out! No two ways about this! > > ------------------------------ > *From:* subramaniam sreenivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Thursday, 23 October, 2008 6:54:20 AM > *Subject:* RE: Vani re-union.. in Boston!! ... Addition to Family > > > > Nayan , Disha > > I like the idea of dropping Laxman for Misra ... > > Like Disha pointed out, Zaheer and Harbhajan have demonstrated that they > can be useful with the bat. If 3 or 4 of the top 5 batsmen have failed, we > are pretty much staring down the barrel anyway, what can Laxman do to save > us ? With Kumble in, he can be handy with the bat too. > > We have to play 5 bowlers ... But, as usual, our over conservative > selectors and captain will think differently, If Dhoni is the captain for > the other 2 matches, he would play 5 bowlers. > > Nayan .. the way Disha is going, looks like we wont be missing your > analysis any longer .. Go Disha ... > > Subu > ________________________________ > > Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:59:31 +0100 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Vani re-union.. in Boston!! ... Addition to Family > > To: [email protected] > > > > Not as knowledgeable as you and aussie subu are, its only b'cos I love > the game - try and follow everything about it. Since you were travelling > there was no in-depth analysis on the day to day progress for the second > test, so that was missed (hv will love to read this…!!) > > > > I was thinking on similar lines, will mishra be replaced or retained and > if he is retained who else has to go…. > > > > if harbhajan and zaheer add 100 odd runs as they did in the first match, > can we afford to replace laxman? Go with five bowlers or four? This is very > interesting…. > > > > Anyway, look forward to more responses…… > > > > D > > _________________________________________________________________ > Stay organized with simple drag and drop from Windows Live Hotmail. > http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_102008 > ------------------------------ > Bring your gang together. Do your thing. Find your favourite Yahoo! > Group.<http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_groups_9/*http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VaniV88-89" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/VaniV88-89?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
