Hi Indu, See your request has been accepted!
________________________________ From: indu iyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, 24 October, 2008 4:14:09 PM Subject: Re: Vani re-union.. in Boston!! ... Addition to Family hi there sorry to cut into ur interesting cricket discussion, but don't u guys think its time to change the subject line from "reunion in boston.......addition to family" to something more appropriate? :-) cheers! indu On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:08 AM, Nayan Mapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hmmmm, Good ones from Disha and you both! Arre, boss changing the composition of the team is not advisable especially since you have won the last test match and were looking down the barrel in the previous one since our batters got out cheaply in the first one! Every bowler can bat but that doesnt mean that you can count Harbhajan/Zaheer or Kumble for their batting in place of a proven track record of Laxman. I dont think we are going to need 5 bowlers in the Delhi match. 5 bowlers are needed on a ground where wickets are hard to come by, Delhi is a more bowler friendly wicket as has been seen in the previous matches played on this ground. There is a theory in cricket, when you are sure about the result you never go overboard, i mean you never play an additional bowler at the cost of a batsmen! For me, the ideal situation would be not to change the composition of the team since Kumble's current form is pretty ordinary but in case he has to play then obviously either Amit Mishra or Bhajji will have to sit out! No two ways about this! ________________________________ From: subramaniam sreenivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, 23 October, 2008 6:54:20 AM Subject: RE: Vani re-union.. in Boston!! ... Addition to Family Nayan , Disha I like the idea of dropping Laxman for Misra ... Like Disha pointed out, Zaheer and Harbhajan have demonstrated that they can be useful with the bat. If 3 or 4 of the top 5 batsmen have failed, we are pretty much staring down the barrel anyway, what can Laxman do to save us ? With Kumble in, he can be handy with the bat too. We have to play 5 bowlers ... But, as usual, our over conservative selectors and captain will think differently, If Dhoni is the captain for the other 2 matches, he would play 5 bowlers. Nayan .. the way Disha is going, looks like we wont be missing your analysis any longer .. Go Disha ... Subu ________________________________ > Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:59:31 +0100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Vani re-union.. in Boston!! ... Addition to Family > To: [email protected] > > Not as knowledgeable as you and aussie subu are, its only b'cos I love the > game - try and follow everything about it. Since you were travelling there > was no in-depth analysis on the day to day progress for the second test, so > that was missed (hv will love to read this…!!) > > I was thinking on similar lines, will mishra be replaced or retained and if > he is retained who else has to go…. > > if harbhajan and zaheer add 100 odd runs as they did in the first match, can > we afford to replace laxman? Go with five bowlers or four? This is very > interesting…. > > Anyway, look forward to more responses…… > > D _________________________________________________________________ Stay organized with simple drag and drop from Windows Live Hotmail. http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_102008 ________________________________ Bring your gang together. Do your thing. Find your favourite Yahoo! Group. Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VaniV88-89" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/VaniV88-89?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
