There are 2 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

      1. Re: On Tamil Militarism ; a 11 part essay by D.P.Sivaram written in 
1992
           From: Rajendhra Cholan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
      2. Fw: Digest Number 361
           From: "Thangavelu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 1         
   Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 01:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
   From: Rajendhra Cholan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: On Tamil Militarism ; a 11 part essay by D.P.Sivaram written in 
1992

In my personal opinion, a person should be Valorous and and Good.
 
Tamils are usually very compassionate and this had been a problem, at many 
instances. I do not know, about our Eezham brothers, but in Thamizhagam, this 
is prevalent. This had made them friendly with all others but, sometime, not 
between Tamils. 
 
Even, today, traditional Silambam, is losing its identity slowly. And same with 
other tamil martial arts. 
 
Rajendhra Cholan!
 
þ᧺ó¾¢Ã §º¡Æý!

Å¡ú¸ ÅÇ÷¸ ¾Á¢ú! Å¡ú¸ ÅÇ÷¸ ¾Á¢Æ÷! ±ý¦ÈýÚõ ´í̸ ¾Á¢Æ¸õ!
To read, type and use Thamizh http://www.tamil.net/newtamil/ekalappai_1.html 

 
 
RVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tamil Militarism ; a 11 part essay by D.P.Sivaram written in 1992
Part 4: Militarism and Caste in Jaffna
by D.P. Sivaram

[courtesy: Lanka Guardian, July 1, 1992, pp.9-10 and 14; prepared by 
Sachi Sri Kantha, for the electronic record]

Tamil secessionism and Tamil militarism are two sides of the same 
coin. Both are legacies of the attempt by the British to demilitarize 
Tamil society in the 19th century. Tamil militarism arose from the 
grievances of the disfranchised Tamil military castes. Tamil 
secession was the result of the political ambitions of the classes 
which were promoted by the British to consolidate the gains of 
demartialization. Therefore it is necessary to understand the 
colonial strategies which were aimed at depriving the traditional 
power and status of the Tamil martial castes in Tamil society.

In those regions of India where military service was confined to 
specific castes, other castes had no desire to abandon their 
traditional occupations for soldiering or for violence. Since the 
ability for violence was caste bound, disfranchising or removing a 
region's military caste could negate its potential for violence and 
rebellion. The earliest attempt to thus demilitarize Tamil society 
was made by the Portuguese in Jaffna. A brief examination of their 
effort and its impact on the subsequent evolution of society in 
Jaffna will help understand better the social and political 
consequences of demilitarization in Tamilnadu two centuries later 
under British rule.

The Maravar were the traditional soldier caste of Jaffna when the 
Portuguese arrived. Once they took control, they set about 
dismantling the feudal military system of the peninsula. Military 
titles such as Rayer, Athirayer were banned. The traditional soldier 
castes were seen as a threat to Portuguese control. In 1627 Lancarote 
de Seixas, Captain Major of Jaffna, put forward the idea that the 
peninsula's security lay in having none there, but cultivators. Thus 
began the rise of the Vellalas in Jaffna. The Portuguese seem to have 
also favoured another caste called the Madapalli. The Vellalas were 
not only cultivators, but a section of them which had developed 
scribal skills, provided the local officials, interpreters and 
karnams (accountants). Successive colonial powers found Vellala 
scribal groups useful where Brahmins were not forthcoming. Histories 
of Jaffna were written and presented to the Portuguese, which showed 
the Vellala and the Madapalli as the original and dominant community 
of the peninsula.

The Kailaya Malai and the Vaiya Padal, the earliest works on the 
colonization of Jaffna, appear to be such histories. They name the 
chieftains of Tamilnadu who had brought Tamil colonists to the 
peninsula with them. All of them are described as Vellalas. But 
eleven of them have Kallar and Maravar caste titles. The Jaffna 
Maravar were able to resume their caste occupation under the Dutch, 
who met troop shortages through Jaffna's feudal military system which 
the Portuguese had attempted to dismantle. The Dutch governor and 
director of Ceylon, Thomas van Rhee informed his successor Gerrit de 
Heere in 1697, that in the Jaffna peninsula "the Marruas are bound to 
serve the Company as Lascoryns (native soldiers) and pay t[w]o Fanams 
a year without anything more". But 93 years later, a Dutch census 
(1790) of all males between the ages 16-70 in Jaffna recorded that 
there were only 49 Maravar males in the peninsula, as against 1,570 
Vellala males. This was due to a widespread process in Tamil society 
where military castes, finding their traditional status gone, simply 
adopted the Vellala caste title and returned themselves as peaceful 
Vellala cultivator, to the colonial census; and in time became 
endogamous subdivisions of that caste.

In 1834, Simon Casie Chitty recorded in his Ceylon Gazetteer, that 
Kallar, Maravar, Ahampadiyar and Palli (Vanniyar) were sub-divisions 
of the Vellala caste. It is clear that the Tamil martial castes of 
Jaffna had swelled the ranks of the Vellalas when faced with 
unfavourable conditions under colonial rule, as they later did under 
the British in Tamilnadu. This gave rise to the saying in the 
peninsula, "Kallar, Maravar and Ahampadiyar came slowly, slowly and 
became Vellalas." But, unlike their counterparts in Tamilnad, the 
Jaffna Vellalas didn't generally change their military caste 
titles. "In former days the Vellalas had the titles of Rayan, Thevan, 
Kizhan and Mazhavan."

Today, one of these military caste subdivisions of the Jaffna Vellala 
community, bearing the Kallar caste title Mazhavarayar is a dominant 
land owning clan in the peninsula. The Mazhavarayar clan is also 
connected with the history of Thambiluvil in the Eastern province. 
The Mattakkalappu Manmiyam, a work which deals with the colonization 
of Batticaloa, mentions the mazhavar frequently among the groups 
which peopled the Eastern province. Although the `vellalization' of 
Jaffna's Tamil military castes predates the same process in south 
India, Vellala cultural hegemony was achieved in the peninsula only 
during the early decades of the twentieth century. The persistence of 
endogamous subdivision identities was one reason for this.

The Vellalization of culture and religion in the peninsula began with 
Arumuga Navalar's attempt to convert the Jaffnese from their folk 
religion which was dominated by the heroes and godlings of the Tamil 
martial castes. The martial caste elements also figures in narratives 
related to the founding of Valvettithurai and Myliddy – Karaiyar 
caste villages on the Jaffna coast, which are key. Whereas the Sri 
Lankan karava (Karaiyar) caste in general has claimed kshatriya 
status – that they are descended from the Kuru dynasty – a strong 
narrative is found among the Karaiyar of Myliddy which states that 
three Marava chieftains who were brothers came with their caste-men 
from Tamilnadu, married among the karaiyar and founded the village. 
Its dominant clan, known as Thuraiyar – the others are known as 
Panivar – was connected by marriage to Ramnad, the home country of 
the Maravar, until recent times.

The martial arts of Maravar were popular among the Thuraiyar of 
Myliddy, before their youth were introduced to modern methods of 
military training in the last decade [i.e., 1980s]. A narrative 
related to the founding of Valvettithurai, based on folk etymology 
states that the village arose on land given to a Marava chieftain, 
called Valliathevan, by the eponymous founder of the Tamil kingdom of 
Jaffna. But a strong tradition was prevalent among the Karaiyar of 
Valvettithurai that they had fought the Portuguese as the soldiers of 
the last king of Jaffna, Sankili. This tradition, as we shall see 
later, was greatly exploited by TULF propagandists to mobilise people 
in that part of Jaffna. The tradition seems to be related to the 
trade wars between the early colonial powers and the Maravar kings of 
Ramnad.

The Portuguese, Dutch and the British tried to wrest control of the 
profitable rice and chank trade between Burma, Bengal and Ceylon 
which was in the hands of the Thevars (title of the Ramnad kings) and 
their Muslim and Tamil tradesmen, on either side of the Palk Strait, 
among whom were many Karaiyar schooner proprietors of Valvettithurai, 
Point Pedro and Thondamanaru. The British found that one 
Vaithianathan of Jaffna was among the few confidantes of the Thevar, 
who were looking after his chank trade in Calcutta. Karaiyar families 
carried on with the rice and chank trade in collaboration with 
Muslims, Chetties and military caste families on the south Indian 
coast from Ramnad to Tanjore, even after the British finally wrested 
control of it from the Maravar kings of Ramnad.

A large number of Thandayals (traditional navigators – captains of 
ocean going craft) from Valvettithurai, Point Pedro were employed in 
the Thevar's domain of sea trade. This became the basis of a 
vast `smuggling network' between south India, Sri Lanka and southeast 
Asia, after independence in1948. The powerful Vandayar family 
(Maravar) of Tanjore maintained very close relations with a leading 
business house of Valvettithurai until 1983. Sometimes such 
connections between the coastal military castes of south Tamilnadu 
and the Karaiyar of Jaffna were cemented through marriage. Although 
Jaffna Tamil society was the earliest to have been de-martialized, 
and was the only part of the south Indian Tamil region where 
traditional Tamil military castes were completely subsumed by Vellala 
identity, it has become the ground in which the most fierce 
manifestation of Tamil militarism has taken root in modern times. How 
was this possible? Three reasons can be identified.

(A) The pro-colonial politics of the Jaffna Vellala was not 
formulated as an attitude against traditional militarisms because the 
Tamil military castes having assumed the Vellala identity early, were 
not present as a social threat in the peninsula to the consolidation 
of colonial authority, after the Portuguese period. Furthermore, the 
nature of the Vellala caste composition in Jaffna was in itself not 
amenable to the scribal-agrarian conservatism of the pure Vellala 
elites, which the British found useful in Tamilnadu. The pseudo-
Vellala component of Jaffna was large. A fundamental distinction 
between the Vellala elite of Tamilnad and Jaffna would illustrate the 
point.

Arumuga Navalar campaigned against the activities of Christian 
missionaries and his efforts received support from Ponnuchami Thevar, 
the chief Marava noble of Ramnad. In former days, the Maravar had 
opposed the spread of Christianity, by massacaring missionaries. On 
the other hand, in Tamilnad, an ideologue of Vellala elitism – 
J.M.Nallasami Pillai, who like Navalar worked for the propagation of 
saiva siddhanthism among the Tamils, was closely associated with and 
supported by Anglican missionaries in his efforts.

As we shall see later, while Nallasami Pillai carefully and 
deliberately played down the martial component of Tamil culture and 
history, attempting to establish that Tamil civilization was 
constituted by the peace-loving Vellalas, his counterpart in Jaffna, 
Mootootambi Pillai lamented the decline of the peninsula's martial 
heritage. He wrote in 1912,

"When Sankili – the last king of Jaffna – fought the Portuguese, most 
of his soldiers were warriors of Jaffna. Even the Portuguese have 
praised their valour. The victory of the Portuguese was not gained 
through their bravery, but through Kaakai Vanniyan's treachery. 
Wasn't it the warrior of Jaffna who conquered the whole of Ceylon? 
The people (of Jaffna) who are descended of those warriors have lost 
their martial traits and become a despicable race, having been 
subjugated long under the Portuguese and the Dutch and as a result 
having become weak and losing their self-identity."

Mootootambi Pillai was reflecting a sentiment that had been expressed 
in the Madurai Tamil Sangam – established by the Marava noble, 
Pandithurai Thevar (the son of the noble who had earlier helped 
Navalar) that the decline of the Tamil nation was caused by the 
deterioration of its ancient and unique martial heritage.

(B) The closure of the avenues by which Vellala upward mobility and 
conservatism under successive Sinhala governments in Sri Lanka. The 
colonial powers opened these avenues to promote the class and culture 
of Vellala conservatism as a bulwark and gurantee against the 
turbulence of Tamil feudal militarism. The restrictions placed on 
university admissions and on government jobs seriously undermined the 
class and culture of Vellala conservatism and its politics of non-
violence and compromise. The other narrative that was contending at 
this juncture, for Tamilian identity – Tamil militarism – began to 
assert itself as the bulwark built by colonial powers against it 
crumbled.

(C) Non-Vellala pockets in the peninsula where the values of Vellala 
conservatism had made little impact.

http://www.sangam.org/articles/view2/?uid=1013




---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

   To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/varalaaRu/
  
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



þ᧺ó¾¢Ã §º¡Æý!


Å¡ú¸ ÅÇ÷¸ ¾Á¢ú! Å¡ú¸ ÅÇ÷¸ ¾Á¢Æ÷! ±ý¦ÈýÚõ ´í̸ ¾Á¢Æ¸õ!

To read, type and use Thamizh http://www.tamil.net/newtamil/ekalappai_1.html
                
---------------------------------
Discover Yahoo!
 Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online & more.  Check it out!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 2         
   Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 22:16:10 -0400
   From: "Thangavelu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Fw: Digest Number 361

Raveen

It starts from part 4!?


VT
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <varalaaRu@yahoogroups.com>
To: <varalaaRu@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 8:01 PM
Subject: [varalaaRu] Digest Number 361


There are 2 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

      1. On Tamil Militarism ; a 11 part essay by D.P.Sivaram written in 
1992
           From: "RVS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
      2. Part 3: Tamil Militarism - The Code of Suicide
           From: "RVS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/varalaaRu/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply via email to