On Jan 8, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Theo > Schlossnagle > writes: >> Hi guys, >> >> I'd really like to be able to contribute some of the improvements >> we've made to varnish back. Is there a way I can get access to >> commit. I'd be happy to stay in my own branch. My current patch set >> is unwieldy and I'm very tempted to just start my own repos... That, >> of course, seems silly. I've fixed up (removed) some of the gccism >> in >> favor or more portability (#include over -include). I've fixed a few >> bugs, made the VCC line a but smarter and more accepting of non gcc >> compiler, I've added a portfs acceptor and built a storage_umem >> allocator facility that rides on Solaris' excellent libumem (highly >> scalable allocator) which we also ported to run on Linux and FreeBSD >> (and Mac OS X): https://labs.omniti.com/trac/portableumem >> >> Next steps? > > Can you mail me a link to the patch ?
http://lethargy.org/~jesus/misc/varnish-solaris-trunk-2328.diff Enjoy! -- Theo Schlossnagle Principal/CEO OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. W: http://omniti.com P: +1.443.325.1357 x201 F: +1.410.872.4911 _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list varnish-dev@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
