On 13.03.2008, at 22:45, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Jodok Batl > ogg writes: > >> or is it really true that i need dedicated boxes for caching only? > > If your operating system has a VM system worth its salt, no.
so you mean - in case the box is busy accessing objects from cache memory and busy accessing some items from varnish cache and another application is busy and accesses some other objects from memory frequently my 2.6 linux kernel is intelligent enough to decide what to keep in memory and what to put to swap. that would be great :) what is varnish's disk file exactly for? is varnish using "real" memory only and "swapping" to its own file? thanks jodok > > > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by > incompetence. -- "Beautiful is better than ugly." -- The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters Jodok Batlogg, Lovely Systems GmbH Schmelzhütterstraße 26a, 6850 Dornbirn, Austria mobile: +43 676 5683591, phone: +43 5572 908060 _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list varnish-dev@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
