Sorry for the comment at the end of my prevous email, got your emails in reverse order here :-)
>> Doesn't Solaris have fcntl(F_SETLK) as mandated by POSIX ? >Ah, good catch. That wasn't a patch for Solaris. It was for Linux. >We've run into some issues with flock being more reliable than fcntl >on Linux under high concurrency environments. We're not even remotely close to concurrency, so I'd prefer to stick with fcntl until we see any actual problems. >> Is there a reason to name the shared object .so instead of .o or is it >> just cosmetics ? > >The Sun Studio toolchain barfs on the .o. It "knows better" [...] Ok, fair enough. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list varnish-dev@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev