In message <d38199ba-78a0-4c7a-a26a-a24d070b6...@develooper.com>, =?iso-8859-1?
Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= writes:
>
>On Feb 1, 2010, at 1:35, Anders Nordby wrote:
>
>> I must object to this change, as I use varnishncsa -b extensively to
>> pull out reports on missed objects being fetch from the backends too
>> often. Please revert this change, as varnishncsa -b has its use.
>
>I don't know why it was removed or if there's a good alternative,
>but I've found the -b option very useful, too.

Well, the code to implement it full was never there, and people were
reporting core dumps because of it, so we figured we would make the
non-support for -b explicit, until the code could be written.

There are no objections to supporting it, it's just code to be
written by somebody... (nudge, nudge, wink, wink...)

Poul-Henning


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev

Reply via email to