In message 
<cabuevew2p64dcayq2_rh_zr-_sx7ycg95qb7q2wqj4o_hnh...@mail.gmail.com>, Magnus 
Hagander writes:

>> vcl_fetch{} becomes vcl_reponse{}
>>
>> A new vcl_fetch{}
>>

>Maybe I'm coming in late to this game, but is it really necessary to
>reuse the old name? I'm seeing a lot of confusion amongst people for
>the simple reuse of "purge" in version 3 to mean something completely
>different to what it used to mean. This sounds like it could be even
>worse... Probably a lot less confusing if a completely new name can be
>invented, if it's a new function that does something else...

Suggest a better name ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[email protected]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev

Reply via email to