--------
In message <cabovn9d7u3feztctjvtjmky_j5h4tyfg_-j9on+qxseg+5p...@mail.gmail.com>
, Dridi Boukelmoune writes:

>Speaking of Varnish 5, I wish to expose VCL probes and ACLs to VMODs
>in 4.1, the missing pieces for dynamic backends. The code is in
>patchwork, but I won't be around to support it before the release. So
>hopefully in 4.1 or 4.1.1 (same for the DNS director).

As long as we only talk static ACLs and probes, refcounting is
a non-issue, and I'll get to those patches after I look at martins
panic patches.

>> But for now, dynamic backends should work for 4.1, but VMODS should
>> take care to not needlessly replace dynamic backends with identical
>> new ones (as vmod_debug does intentionally).
>
>If you look at the DNS director patch, you'll see extra care in not
>removing backends needlessly.

I havn't looked at that patch yet.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[email protected]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev

Reply via email to