I agree with Lasse as well, we should keep the wiki. It might be worth exploring https://help.github.com/articles/user-organization-and-project-pages/ for the website and/or wiki.
I'm happy to co-admin/root any server if required but IMO if we can avoid any maintenance by using the above it'd be better. I'm also happy contributing towards some VPS solution, Digital Ocean being my preferred at the moment. One question that comes to my mind is what is going to happen with repo.varnish-cache.org after we move out of VS. Are we going to continue providing packages? On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Kacper Wysocki <kacp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Lasse Karstensen > <lkars...@varnish-software.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 02:48:28PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > [cut] > >> I'm currently disinclined to have a Wiki in the future, it seems > >> to never really have worked for us. If we later find out we need > >> one, github or Wikia are obvious solutions. > > > > The wiki doesn't work because we've turned off user registrations > > to combat spammers. > > > > I strongly believe we should revive it when we have the chance. > (==github move) > > > > It is a natural place to keep information that is too specific to go > > into the main documentation, or too small of a detail to warrant a > > documentation commit. > > > > Just making a (living) FAQ that we can use in #varnish for the normal > > questions would be a big improvement. I'm happy to take point on this, > > if that is what it is needed. > > So good to hear that revamping the site will be a priority going forward. > I'm happy to help in any way that I can. > > I agree with Lasse that the wiki has an important place as a living > document, and that a whole lot of VCL snippets and varnish tricks are > ending up on Other Peoples Blogs™ because the trac wiki has been > broken (by spammers). > > It may be useful in the future to give someone the wiki-admin-hat so > they can mark out-of-date content, avoiding the old issue of vcl > snippets for Varnish 2.0 still floating about. > > That being said, getting a nicer ticketing system would be super sweet > and the old ticket system is definitely the first thing to deserve a > bullet. > > cheers, > 0K > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-dev mailing list > varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev >
_______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
