On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Guillaume Quintard <guilla...@varnish-software.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Federico Schwindt <fg...@lodoss.net> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> In the 304 case we were already skipping it for non-zero C-L. >> For 204 responses this was introduced as a side effect of 271e1c52. >> >> Comments? OK? > > > Looks OK to me.
+1 for the one-liner _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
