-------- In message <CABoVN9Btu8j7N9G9Htk61qRj-g-fa7toY8ia_jf=ko468j+...@mail.gmail.com> , Dridi Boukelmoune writes: >> Best proposal for "???" seems to be "auto", even though it is not >> entirely on point. >> >> The implementation can control its view of the health two ways >> >> A) Call VRT_SetHealth() and set it on the director. >> (useful for probes as we know them) >> >> B) Provide a ->healthy() method which will be asked whenever >> anybody wants to know. >> (useful for selecting directors like rr/fb/rnd/hash) > >"auto" is what we have today in the CLI, and I don't remember ever >being confused by that when I was only a user. And it seems to >still match your A) and B) cases.
Where it doesn't match is a backend without probe/other mechanism. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev