André Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And regarding my other question... Should Perlbal handle the request > first, and pass it to some varnish process or should varnish process > the request first and send only the misses to PerlBal+Apache?
Isn't that really the same question? Either you run Varnish in front of Perlbal on the Perlbal servers, or you run it in front of Apache on the Apache servers. > Perlbal is probably better at load-balancing since it is it's core > function, no? Considering that Varnish doesn't do load balancing at all (yet), I would concur that Perlbal is probably better at it :) DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav Senior Software Developer Linpro AS - www.linpro.no _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
