Alright. Wonder then if somebody has any rpm's to share for Redhat EL4 i386 with the patch included?
Regards <fredrik /> On 29 feb 2008, at 12.25, Anders Vännman wrote: I guess its the same problem that ive had, and there is a patch regarding it; http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/ticket/197 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:23:21 +0100 > From: Fredrik Nygren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Blank pages with HTTP/1.0 > To: varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no > Cc: Stina Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Sj?dell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Petri Luomala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter > Granstr?m > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > Hi, > I have a couple of servers with Varnish 1.1.2-5 installed. Some > visitors has reported a blank page when they are visiting us. What I > can se from our logs the problem seems to be related to the visitors > HTTP protocol version. Requests with HTTP/1.0 gets a blank page but > HTTP/1.1 not. Our Apache logs shows this: > > [28/Feb/2008:10:32:14 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.1" 200 145883 "-" > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR > 1.1.4322)" > [28/Feb/2008:10:39:53 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.1" 200 145863 "-" > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR > 1.1.4322)" > [28/Feb/2008:10:44:18 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.1" 200 145886 "-" > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)" > [28/Feb/2008:10:44:32 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.0" 200 17491 "-" > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)" > [28/Feb/2008:10:44:43 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.0" 200 17491 "-" > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)" > [28/Feb/2008:10:44:44 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.0" 200 17491 "-" > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)" > [28/Feb/2008:10:44:45 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.0" 200 17491 "-" > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)" > [28/Feb/2008:10:44:47 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.0" 200 17491 "-" > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)" > [28/Feb/2008:10:45:04 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.0" 200 17491 "-" > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)" > [28/Feb/2008:11:21:09 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.1" 200 146633 "-" > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)" > [28/Feb/2008:12:31:46 +0100] "GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.1" 200 146205 "-" > "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)" > > Responses with 17491 bytes in return are blank page views. > From our varnishlog I read the following: > > 134 SessionOpen c 134.25.0.133 14373 > 134 ReqStart c 134.25.0.133 14373 2174456149 > 134 RxRequest c GET > 134 RxURL c / > 134 RxProtocol c HTTP/1.0 > 134 RxHeader c Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, > image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/vnd.ms-excel, > application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/msword, */* > 134 RxHeader c Accept-Language: sv > 134 RxHeader c UA-CPU: x86 > 134 RxHeader c User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; > Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) > 134 RxHeader c Host: www.smp.se > 134 RxHeader c Cookie: > __utma=147067189.81457932.1204189951.1204189951.1204189951.1; > __utmb=147067189; __utmz=147067189.1204189951.1.1.utmccn=(direct)| > utmcsr=(direct)|utmcmd=(none); InsightXE022004=216172787026292393 > 134 RxHeader c X-NovINet: v1.2 > 134 RxHeader c Via: 1.0 portos.sr.se:8080 (squid/2.6.STABLE18) > 134 RxHeader c Cache-Control: max-age=259200 > 134 VCL_call c recv lookup > 134 VCL_call c hash hash > 134 HitPass c 2174455371 > 134 VCL_call c pass pass > 134 Backend c 123 smp > 134 ObjProtocol c HTTP/1.1 > 134 ObjStatus c 200 > 134 ObjResponse c OK > 134 ObjHeader c Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:22:29 GMT > 134 ObjHeader c Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1 > 134 ObjHeader c Content-Type: text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1 > 134 ObjHeader c Content-Language: sv-SE > 134 ObjHeader c Set-Cookie: > JSESSIONID=4CF19E800052C32EC682743E8D6B8920.sehan9078gota8009; Path=/ > 134 TTL c 2174456149 RFC 120 1204190549 1204190549 0 0 0 > 134 VCL_call c fetch pass > 134 Length c 0 > 134 VCL_call c deliver deliver > 134 TxProtocol c HTTP/1.1 > 134 TxStatus c 200 > 134 TxResponse c OK > 134 TxHeader c Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1 > 134 TxHeader c Content-Type: text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1 > 134 TxHeader c Content-Language: sv-SE > 134 TxHeader c Set-Cookie: > JSESSIONID=4CF19E800052C32EC682743E8D6B8920.sehan9078gota8009; Path=/ > 134 TxHeader c Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:22:29 GMT > 134 TxHeader c X-Varnish: 2174456149 > 134 TxHeader c Age: 0 > 134 TxHeader c Via: 1.1 varnish > 134 TxHeader c Connection: close > 134 ReqEnd c 2174456149 1204190549.767153978 > 1204190549.773138046 0.000030041 0.005959034 0.000025034 > > I have searched the mailinglist and found this thread which seems to > look like our problem but I'm not sure it's the same problem: > http://projects.linpro.no/pipermail/varnish-misc/2008-February/001349.html > > Is there a known problem with the HTTP/1.0 protocol and Varnish? > > Regards > <fredrik /> > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no > http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc > > > End of varnish-misc Digest, Vol 23, Issue 25 > ******************************************** _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc