This is a very strange comment. If Varnish requires a particular sequence, it should implement its own. If it requires particular statistical properties, it should test for those, not test for a specific sequence.
Tim On Jan 8, 2009, at 2:12 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r3367 | phk | 2008-11-10 10:37:21 +0100 (ma., 10 nov. 2008) | 14 lines > > Add a toplevel word which examines the sequence returned by > srandom(1) and stops the test if we do not get the same sequence > as we expect. > > The Open Group does not define which deterministic sequence srandom(1) > should result in, on that it be deterministic, but I have high hopes > in the general sanity and expect that UNIX people across the board > have realized that for portability the same sequence should be > returned on all platforms. > > At the very least FreeBSD and Linux/GLIBC, as seen on > projects.linpro.no, > agree. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc