Ole Laursen <o...@...> writes: > just a matter of having enough RAM to keep the requested data in memory. For > this reason, I don't think there's any point in using Varnish's cache in this > kind of setup.
In other words, unless you need some other feature of Varnish, you might as well route the requests directly to lighttpd. In my case, we had one server only so Varnish was convenient for multiplexing port 80 in addition to caching the dynamic HTML parts from an Apache web app. Ole _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
