Am 10.03.2011 16:41, schrieb Poul-Henning Kamp: > In message <[email protected]>, Allan Wind > writ > es: >> Is the current thinking still that SSL support will not be >> integrated into varnish? > > Yes, that is current thinking. I can see no advantages that outweigh > the disadvantages, and a realistic implementation would not be > significantly different from running a separate process to do the > job in the first place.
stunnel has the disatwantage that we loose the clientIP information. Intigration of SSL in varnish wouldn't have this problem. with pound thios can be fixen by analysing the forewarded-for header but isn't that elegant. Regards Estartu -- ---------------------------------------------------------- Gerhard Schmidt | E-Mail: [email protected] Technische Universität München | Jabber: [email protected] WWW & Online Services | Tel: +49 89 289-25270 | PGP-PublicKey Fax: +49 89 289-25257 | on request
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
