In message <[email protected]>, Kacper Wysocki writes:
>Or 3.1, as the case may be? No, that is not a major version, that is only a minor version. Listen, I'm not doing this kind of stuff to hurt anybody. Backwards compatibility and "syntactic sugare" is always a tradeoff of where you want to spend your effort. With the limited amount of developers and testers we have available in Varnish, I have prioritized getting important stuff done, which in this particular context included VMODS which caused a pretty extensive rewrite of the VCL compiler. In all likelyhood, some of your VCL scripts should be converted to a VMOD (Sorry: you cannot write VMOD's in VCL yet) and once you realize what options that gives you, I think you will see the VCL improvements from 2.X to 3.X as quite sensible. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
