Hi All,
On 26.08.11 09:12, "Audun Ytterdal" <[email protected]> wrote: >On low bandwith 1MB could take more than 60 seconds to retrive. >Varnish 3.0 has a send_timeout of 60 seconds while Varnish 2.1 had 600 >seconds. >I had to adjust send_timeout to 600 again on my 3.0 installation for >pdf downloads and such. Just out of curiosity, why does varnish has a send_timeout in the first place? As long as data is going over the wire, a connection shouldn't get closed. I can understand a first_byte_timeout and an in_between_bytes_timeout. But a pure send_timeout doesn't make sense to me. Or am I understanding the use of send_timeout wrong? Cheers, Marian _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
