On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 03:06:21PM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote: > does anyone have thoughts on this. The statement "don't know about > the ban lurker, > and write 100% req-based ban. (In part due > to the presence of ban.url and ban_url)" to me means people will be > issuing "ban" commands and not realizing they wont work b/c the ban needs > to happen on the obj and not the req.
They'll work just fine, they just won't be processed by the ban lurker. > Are there any strategies to this other than some of the workarounds posted > (setting headers and and then storing the req.url in obj.url in vcl_recv) No. (And there's no obj.url, but we get the picture) -- Andreas _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
