Doesn't worker threads also use memory for both their call stacks and workspace ? I believe this is not part of the storage, as well as the "naked" memory footprint of varnishd.
Best Regards, Dridi On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Sean Allen <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm seeing something higher like 5k per. > > 6g malloc. > 600k objects cached right now > varnish has 9.7 gigs of memory resident > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Per Buer <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Sean Allen >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> Does Varnish need additional memory beyond what is allocated via malloc? >>> >> >> Yes. Malloc is only the backend storage. In addition there are a few data >> structures that are global. If I recall correctly the overhead is more or >> less 1k per object. >> >> >> -- >> <http://www.varnish-software.com/> *Per Buer* >> CEO | Varnish Software AS >> Phone: +47 958 39 117 | Skype: per.buer >> We Make Websites Fly! >> >> > > > -- > > Ce n'est pas une signature > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
