On 11/07/13 03:06 AM, Mattias Geniar wrote: >> >> any idea what I can use instead of sm_balloc for monitoring cache file? >> >> if my message is confusing, I can point to more detailed information.
> You should be able to use SMF.s0.g_bytes (bytes allocated) and > SMF.s0.g_space (bytes free). To total amount of possible memory would be > the sum of both. ah, well this would make more sense. thanks to both of you. -- Gabriel Filion
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
