Hi I have used the below command
*ps -eo pmem,pcpu,vsize,pid,cmd | sort -k 1 -nr | head -5* And I have got the below output. Also I have a monitoring tool UIM which also states still memory is holding up at 90% eventhough Varnish server is literally idle 90.9 0.1 17561316 12953 /u01/varnishapp/sbin/varnishd -P /u01/varnishapp/varnish_pid.pid -a :15001 -f /u01/varnishapp/etc/default.vcl -T 127.0.0.1:6082 -t 7200 -p thread_pool_min=50 -p thread_pool_max=1000 -p thread_pool_timeout=120 -u svc_varnishghs -g admin_uktil09_onlineservices_varnishghs -S /u01/varnishapp/etc/secret -s malloc,8G 0.5 0.3 100840 29277 bin/varnishlog 0.5 0.0 114156 12949 /u01/varnishapp/sbin/varnishd -P /u01/varnishapp/varnish_pid.pid -a :15001 -f /u01/varnishapp/etc/default.vcl -T 127.0.0.1:6082 -t 7200 -p thread_pool_min=50 -p thread_pool_max=1000 -p thread_pool_timeout=120 -u svc_varnishghs -g admin_uktil09_onlineservices_varnishghs -S /u01/varnishapp/etc/secret -s malloc,8G 0.2 0.1 282492 26519 splunkd -p 8089 start %MEM %CPU VSZ PID CMD On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Andreas Plesner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 02:33:14PM +0530, sujith pv wrote: > > > > I measured it using the linux command to get the highly utilized > processes > > info. So that time it was 30% of memory. > > If you're talking about the VIRT column in "top", that is not a measure of > real memory usage, and I'm going to assume that there really is no issue. > > If not, ask again, but be specific about which numbers you have measured, > and > what the 30% and 90% numbers are derived from. > > -- > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
