It was showing as 0 for Transient_g_bytes and 1Gb for g_space as I mentioned in my mail.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Guillaume Quintard < [email protected]> wrote: > please keep using the mailing list, some other people may have ideas. > > what's the output of "varnishstat -1 | grep g_bytes" ? > > -- > Guillaume Quintard > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:50 PM, sujith pv <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Guillaume >> >> I have tried capping Transient and I could see the respective values >> under SMA.transient.g_bytes/g_space. But still on load I didnt see this >> g_bytes being used and was showing 0 only. >> >> Best Regards >> Sujith P V >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Maybe, not sure. Unless you have a **good** reason to do so, use the >>> packages. >>> >>> -- >>> Guillaume Quintard >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:19 PM, sujith pv <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Guillaume. Actually in my end Varnish was compiled here and >>>> installed (I was not part of that initially :-)). Will this have any impact >>>> compared to as you have mentioned like try from a packaged version. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's just a question of storage, shortlive objects got into transient >>>>> storage instead of the one(s) you defined in the command line. But it's >>>>> still a cache storage, based on malloc, that is by default unlimited in >>>>> size. >>>>> >>>>> The rationale is that for object with such short ttl+grace+keep, a >>>>> simple malloc is good enough. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:04 PM, sujith pv <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Actually I'm confused around the short lived objects. Is these >>>>>> objects are something like cached objects or who is creating these >>>>>> objects. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry, I didn't get your question. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:31 AM, sujith pv <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks Guillaume. May be Im asking a very basic question , but >>>>>>>> still how this short lived objects are created and I'm not giving any >>>>>>>> settings for the same as well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/4.1/reference/varnishd.ht >>>>>>>>> ml#shortlived >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sep 6, 2016 08:07, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Guillaume. I will try the transient settings first and >>>>>>>>>> verify the same. Also could you please elaborate on the short lived >>>>>>>>>> objects. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards >>>>>>>>>> Sujith P V >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Viktor, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Have a look here https://www.varnish-cache >>>>>>>>>>> .org/docs/trunk/users-guide/storage-backends.html#transient- >>>>>>>>>>> storage >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sujith, please try to use a packaged version from your >>>>>>>>>>> distribution. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Viktor Villafuerte < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guillaume, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu 01 Sep 2016 09:53:22, Guillaume Quintard wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> > Is that virtual or real memory? >>>>>>>>>>>> > Try to cap your Transient storage to 1GB, you may be >>>>>>>>>>>> overloaded with short >>>>>>>>>>>> > lived objects. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Could you elaborate on this bit more? I've got very similar >>>>>>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>>>> here. Eg: Total memory 384g >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> VIRT: 487g >>>>>>>>>>>> RES: 311g >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> free says: 46g free >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> but SWAP is 91.3% used :( >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How can this be? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> v >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sep 1, 2016 9:40 AM, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > Hi All >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > I had already mailed this query long back but this time >>>>>>>>>>>> putting in a >>>>>>>>>>>> > > different manner. >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > - We are using Varnish 4.0 in our end. We have a machine >>>>>>>>>>>> with memory >>>>>>>>>>>> > > of 16G with 8G being malloc for Varnish. We have a TTL >>>>>>>>>>>> for 2 hrs as well. >>>>>>>>>>>> > > - During our peak traffic, when we see the total memory >>>>>>>>>>>> of the machine >>>>>>>>>>>> > > reaching 90% and like varnishd process is taking some >>>>>>>>>>>> 89% . >>>>>>>>>>>> > > - So I'm just confused even though we had allocated just >>>>>>>>>>>> 8G malloc >>>>>>>>>>>> > > which is like 50% of the total memory, how the process >>>>>>>>>>>> is eating up 89% of >>>>>>>>>>>> > > memory and the memory is not releasing even after TTL. >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > Any help please... >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > Best Regards >>>>>>>>>>>> > > Sujith P V >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> > > varnish-misc mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> > > [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> > > https://www.varnish-cache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>> lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> > varnish-misc mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> > [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish >>>>>>>>>>>> -misc >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Viktor Villafuerte >>>>>>>>>>>> Optus Internet Engineering >>>>>>>>>>>> t: +61 2 80825265 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
