ps -aux |grep varnish Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.8/FAQ root 4487 0.0 0.0 103312 820 pts/0 S+ 23:47 0:00 grep varnish varnish 18206 0.0 0.0 119904 4932 ? Ss Sep22 1:28 /usr/sbin/varnishd -a :80 -f /etc/varnish/default.vcl -T 127.0.0.1:6082 -t 120 -p thread_pools=1 -p thread_pool_add_delay=2 -p thread_pool_min=500 -p thread_pool_max=2000 -p thread_pool_timeout=120 -p http_gzip_support=true varnish 18210 1.6 3.5 996192 756816 ? Sl Sep22 103:53 /usr/sbin/varnishd -a :80 -f /etc/varnish/default.vcl -T 127.0.0.1:6082 -t 120 -p thread_pools=1 -p thread_pool_add_delay=2 -p thread_pool_min=500 -p thread_pool_max=2000 -p thread_pool_timeout=120 -p http_gzip_support=true
On 09/26/16 9:40 AM, Guillaume Quintard wrote: > Your varnishstat doesn't seem to indicate that (s0.g_bytes + s0.g_space > = 100M). Can you give us the output of "ps aux | grep varnish" ? > > -- > Guillaume Quintard > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Miguel González > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Still I don´t understand the numbers. I have set the Varnish storage in > memory of 6 Gb: > > SMA.s0.c_req 1040458 3.53 Allocator > requests > SMA.s0.c_fail 715580 2.43 Allocator > failures > SMA.s0.c_bytes 8027903959 27242.60 Bytes > allocated > SMA.s0.c_freed 7923307928 26887.65 Bytes freed > SMA.s0.g_alloc 5217 . Allocations > outstanding > SMA.s0.g_bytes 104596031 . Bytes > outstanding > SMA.s0.g_space 261569 . Bytes > available > SMA.Transient.c_req 236994 0.80 Allocator > requests > SMA.Transient.c_fail 0 0.00 Allocator > failures > SMA.Transient.c_bytes 2047296885 <tel:2047296885> > 6947.48 Bytes allocated > SMA.Transient.c_freed 2047294773 <tel:2047294773> > 6947.47 Bytes freed > SMA.Transient.g_alloc 6 . Allocations > outstanding > SMA.Transient.g_bytes 2112 . Bytes > outstanding > SMA.Transient.g_space 0 . Bytes > available > > > > On 09/23/16 11:16 AM, Guillaume Quintard wrote: > > Focus on g_space (free space in the storage) and g_bytes (used bytes in > > the storage). > > > > -- > > Guillaume Quintard > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Miguel González > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > On 09/05/16 10:44 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > >> Any URL? I have googled for a few hours but I didn´t get a clear > > >> understanding from the official manuals. > > > > > > > https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/4.1/reference/varnish-counters.html#per-malloc-storage-counters-sma > > <https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/4.1/reference/varnish-counters.html#per-malloc-storage-counters-sma> > > > <https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/4.1/reference/varnish-counters.html#per-malloc-storage-counters-sma > > <https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/4.1/reference/varnish-counters.html#per-malloc-storage-counters-sma>> > > > > > > I had read the 4.0 docs but I find them quite short and not very > > explanatory. What are the counters? The current use of memory? The > > amount allocated since Varnish was restarted (historical)? At least > for > > me, I would like an example to better understand what those counters > > mean. > > > > Thanks > > > > Miguel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > varnish-misc mailing list > > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc > <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc> > > > <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc > <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
