Actually, don't bother, I did it: https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/issues/2118
And Federico has a fix on the way, thanks a lot for reporting! -- Guillaume Quintard On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Guillaume Quintard < [email protected]> wrote: > Confirmed. Would you mind opening a ticket about it? > > -- > Guillaume Quintard > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Reinis Rozitis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> has there something changed in 5.0.0 regarding varnishstat (or is there a >> bug) as the -f doesn't seem to work. >> >> varnishstat -V >> varnishstat (varnish-5.0.0 revision 99d036f) >> >> >> While I can get the full output (also with -1 flag): >> >> varnishstat -1 | grep MAIN.cache_hit >> MAIN.cache_hit 22615 17.26 Cache hits >> MAIN.cache_hitpass 5 0.00 Cache hits for pass >> >> >> varnishstat -1 -f MAIN.cache_hit >> >> doesn't return anything. >> >> >> >> 4.1.x works fine: >> >> varnishstat -V >> varnishstat (varnish-4.1.3 revision 5e3b6d2) >> >> varnishstat -1 -f MAIN.cache_hit >> MAIN.cache_hit 89691619 10.69 Cache hits >> >> >> rr >> >> _______________________________________________ >> varnish-misc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >> > >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
