On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:09:08 -0500 Mark Staudinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> It might also be useful to capture some varnishlog output and > determine what objects are being stored in the Transient pool, and > whether or not your "shortlived" parameter, or default grace value > needs to be adjusted. Even if you do determine you need to do some > things differently here that will prevent the Transient pool from > growing beyond your ideal limit, IMO it's a good idea to keep this > limited anyway. > Hi Mark, I took a look into ttl < 10s objects and saw that they are requests we intentionally apply either "max-age=0, private" or "no-cache, private" to. However their storage field is still "malloc Transient", and transient storage usage only appears to be going up. Any ideas how to investigate further? It's varnish 5.0.0-1, and this didn't happen with 4.1, thought there may well have been configuration changes since then. Regards, -- Niall _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
