I'm fine with adding vmod_dynamic to the varnish docker images so that users have access to this basic functionality, but, for the record: - I really feel this should be considered a basic feature and exist in core - if the docker image starts adding downstream vmods, it opens the gates to a flood of "can you add this vmod too?" questions, which I'm not looking forward to.
-- Guillaume Quintard On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 6:39 AM Nils Goroll <sl...@schokola.de> wrote: > On 03.10.21 18:05, Léo wrote: > > I have found some ways to solve the problem > > https://github.com/nigoroll/libvmod-dynamic exists to do just that > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > varnish-misc@varnish-cache.org > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@varnish-cache.org https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
