I am not sure how a tcpdump will help in any way. Since all the health
check requests are virtually the same. Since the varnish thread that probes
the backend dies every once in a while then it will never show anything
with tcpdump or I virtually have no way to know when it will die in order
to capture an incomplete request using tcpdump.

Please advise.


În lun., 17 apr. 2023 la 19:15, Guillaume Quintard <
[email protected]> a scris:

> That code hasn't moved in a while, so I'd be surprised to see a bug there,
> but that's always possible.
> Any chance you could get a tcpdump of a probe request (from connection to
> disconnection) so we can see what's going on?
> --
> Guillaume Quintard
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 9:12 AM George <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In our case the response body is few bytes (13), header+body is 170
>> bytes. Can this be a bug related to something else perhaps?
>>
>> Please let me know.
>> Thanks
>>
>> În lun., 17 apr. 2023 la 18:47, Guillaume Quintard <
>> [email protected]> a scris:
>>
>>> Thanks, I looked at the code quickly and I'd venture that maybe the
>>> /varnish_check is a bit too large and doesn't fit Varnish's probe buffer
>>> (we only care about the status line of the response anyway), so Varnish
>>> closes the connection while nginx isn't done yet.
>>>
>>> If it's that, it's not very polite, but it's harmless.
>>> --
>>> Guillaume Quintard
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> varnish-misc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>>
>
_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc

Reply via email to